Talk:Development/Tutorials/First program: Difference between revisions
(‘ki18n’ was not declared in this scope) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: I agree with Matt. I usually add a ''Initial Author:'' at the bottom for pages from the old developer wiki code, because they wrote it with often no explicit copyright information. See also [[Talk:Development/Architecture|this page]] --[[User:Dhaumann|Dhaumann]] 17:36, 4 January 2007 (CET) | : I agree with Matt. I usually add a ''Initial Author:'' at the bottom for pages from the old developer wiki code, because they wrote it with often no explicit copyright information. See also [[Talk:Development/Architecture|this page]] --[[User:Dhaumann|Dhaumann]] 17:36, 4 January 2007 (CET) | ||
== ‘ki18n’ was not declared in this scope == | |||
I don't know if this is the place to post this, but I tried to follow this tutorial and get an "error: ‘ki18n’ was not declared in this scope", when trying to compile using the big command gcc main.cpp ... | |||
Revision as of 14:51, 2 July 2007
Adding authors to wiki pages seems counterintuitive to me. The wiki is editable by everybody. Why does it matter who the author of a tutorial is? IMHO the only thing that matters is that the tutorial is kept up to date. --Mattr 03:31, 4 January 2007 (CET)
- I agree with Matt. I usually add a Initial Author: at the bottom for pages from the old developer wiki code, because they wrote it with often no explicit copyright information. See also this page --Dhaumann 17:36, 4 January 2007 (CET)
‘ki18n’ was not declared in this scope
I don't know if this is the place to post this, but I tried to follow this tutorial and get an "error: ‘ki18n’ was not declared in this scope", when trying to compile using the big command gcc main.cpp ...