Projects/Usability/HIG/Concept/KDE4 Personas: Difference between revisions
m Colomar moved page Projects/Usability/Principles/KDE4 Personas to Projects/Usability/HIG/Concept/KDE4 Personas: Moving into the HIG |
|||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
{|- border="0" background:transparent; padding:0px; margin:0px;" valign="top" | {|- border="0" background:transparent; padding:0px; margin:0px;" valign="top" | ||
|[[Image:Introduction_KDE4_Vision_personas_5_geek.png|framed|left]] | |[[Image:Introduction_KDE4_Vision_personas_5_geek.png|framed|left]] | ||
|Philip is a | |Philip is a high school student in his last grade. Later, he wants to go to university to study computer science. He loves the challenge of making technology do what he wants it to do. | ||
When he was 14, he started to probe different programming languages, and since then has implemented various different applications he published under free licenses. He is convinced of Linux and the benefits of free software. | When he was 14, he started to probe different programming languages, and since then has implemented various different applications he published under free licenses. He is convinced of Linux and the benefits of free software. |
Revision as of 12:45, 30 March 2016
KDE Target Users
![]() |
KDE4 Personas: Background
The question "Why should people switch to KDE?" was an important factor in the creation of our Personas – a crucial aspect if we want to extend the current user base. The "Technology Adoption Lifecycle" by Rogers (1962) deals with this question by splitting the overall user base in groups along a bell curve according to their willingness to adopt new technology.
Looking at the "Technology Adoption Lifecycle", you'll find the following user groups:
![]() |
We suggest to move away from the KDE is for everybody approach to KDE is for the more sophisticated 50% of computer users out there, who choose it because it perfectly suits their work and that they "want to have it".
Concentrating on this user base rather than everybody has both pragmatic and motivational reasons: Pragmatically, it will be hard to make KDE a favourite product for laggards and even the late majority within the next five years. Neither cutting away functionality nor hiding all the complexity behind Advanced buttons is an acceptable solution. Second, creating a desktop for ambitious users better fits the current motivation in the KDE development base. We don't want to be simple and stupid, we want to develop a smart desktop with rich functionality!
To avoid misunderstandings: KDE will still be an option for educational, governmental or large enterprise usage – but it won't be the main focus when developing the default desktop. KDE as a configurable framework can still be adjusted to meet the needs of any other user base.