User talk:Harikrishna/Phases/1: Difference between revisions

From KDE TechBase
(New page: -- Activity Context 1). I think "Activity" should be the central context of interest. All other contexts exist just to help the user be more productive and focus on his "Activity" 2). ...)
(No difference)

Revision as of 11:38, 27 August 2008

-- Activity Context 1). I think "Activity" should be the central context of interest. All other contexts exist just to help the user be more productive and focus on his "Activity"

2). User manually creates activities, and can possibly associate semantics to it by special "template tags" (which can be templates for settings, file attributes, apps used in activity, etc), instead of current passive tags used just for linking data.

3). when the user switches activities, the whole environment changes to focus the attention of the user on the related things and auto-tags the resources used (like files created, etc) with the activity.

-- Other Sub Contexts 1). We can just listen to system-wide events (location, resources ) via listeners, send them to User Observation Hub which just broadcasts it

2). System adjusts the focus or auto-tagging according to the subcontexts, if needed