User:Danimo/Wiki Scenarios: Difference between revisions

    From KDE TechBase
    mNo edit summary
    No edit summary
    Line 1: Line 1:
    == Possible Scenarios for future Wiki use on *.kde.org ==
    == Possible Scenarios for future Wiki use on *.kde.org ==
    The suggestions below are the outcome of a BoF during Akademy 2007 in Glasgow. We'd especially like to inquire the opinions of the subproject maintainers. Please add your opinions into the discussion page of this page or contact me on IRC. --[[User:Danimo|Danimo]] 12:28, 8 July 2007 (CEST)


    ===  wiki.kde.org with namespaces ===  
    ===  wiki.kde.org with namespaces ===  

    Revision as of 10:28, 8 July 2007

    Possible Scenarios for future Wiki use on *.kde.org

    The suggestions below are the outcome of a BoF during Akademy 2007 in Glasgow. We'd especially like to inquire the opinions of the subproject maintainers. Please add your opinions into the discussion page of this page or contact me on IRC. --Danimo 12:28, 8 July 2007 (CEST)

    wiki.kde.org with namespaces

    Note: wiki.kde.org will then run mediawiki

    • Pros
      • Easy to maintain
    • Cons
      • Might grow very big
      • Requires namespaces
      • No obvious structure
      • No homogenous target audience

    Unattractive for subprojects

    n /wiki per site

    • Pros
      • Very flexible for projects
    • Cons
      • Sharing templates impossible
      • Sharing files quite hard
      • Interwiki-Links are of limited use
      • n databases

    n role-based wiki sites

    Description: Wikis on domains that target the supposed audience, e.g. users.kde.org.

    Possible compromise between the two suggestions above.

    • Pros
      • Less wiki instances than one per site
    • Cons
      • Sharing templates impossible
      • Sharing files quite hard
      • Interwiki-Links are of limited use
      • n databases

    Action items

    • Investigate OpenID
    • Investigate which target audiences we/the projects want
    • Talk to subprojects
      • What solution do they prefer?
      • To what extend would they go with whatever we do?
      • Whats the additional value for them to join the effort?
    • How and where to migrate the contents of the current wikis?


    Vote

    Please put sign underneath either bullet point that you want to vote for. Anonymous votes will not be counted. Example: **--~~~~


    • wiki.kde.org with namespaces
    • n /wiki per site
    • n role-based wiki sites