User:Danimo/Wiki Scenarios: Difference between revisions

From KDE TechBase
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
** Might grow very big
** Might grow very big
** Requires namespaces
** Requires namespaces
** No obvious structure
** No homogenous target audience
Unattractive for subprojects


=== n /wiki per site ===
=== n /wiki per site ===
Line 37: Line 41:


* Investigate OpenID
* Investigate OpenID
* Investigate which target audiences we/the projects want
* Talk to subprojects
** What solution do they prefer?
** To what extend would they go with whatever we do?
** Whats the additional value for them to join the effort?
* How and where to migrate the contents of the current wikis?

Revision as of 18:07, 2 July 2007

Possible Scenarios for future Wiki use on *.kde.org

wiki.kde.org with namespaces

  • Pros
    • Easy to maintain
  • Cons
    • Might grow very big
    • Requires namespaces
    • No obvious structure
    • No homogenous target audience

Unattractive for subprojects

n /wiki per site

  • Pros
    • Very flexible for projects
  • Cons
    • Sharing templates impossible
    • Sharing files quite hard
    • Interwiki-Links are of limited use
    • n databases

n role-based wiki sites

Possible compromise between the two suggestions above.

  • Pros
    • Less wiki instances than one per site
  • Cons
    • Sharing templates impossible
    • Sharing files quite hard
    • Interwiki-Links are of limited use
    • n databases

Action items

  • Investigate OpenID
  • Investigate which target audiences we/the projects want
  • Talk to subprojects
    • What solution do they prefer?
    • To what extend would they go with whatever we do?
    • Whats the additional value for them to join the effort?
  • How and where to migrate the contents of the current wikis?