Translations:Development/FAQs/Technical FAQ/103/en: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 17:40, 19 July 2019

Information about message (contribute)

This message has no documentation. If you know where or how this message is used, you can help other translators by adding documentation to this message.

Message definition (Development/FAQs/Technical FAQ)

Yes. Calling delete on a null pointer is a noop in C++. Having "if (ptr) delete ptr;" is redundant. Doing <code>ptr = 0;</code> after a delete is a good idea, especially if the delete can be called on it from a different code path.

Yes. Calling delete on a null pointer is a noop in C++. Having "if (ptr) delete ptr;" is redundant. Doing ptr = 0; after a delete is a good idea, especially if the delete can be called on it from a different code path.