GFDL 1.2 is listed twice

Jump to: navigation, search

There are two identical bullets in §8 describing GFDL 1.2, they differ only in letter spacing. Why is that?

Should it be assumed that documentation that bears no licensing metadata is GFDL?

12:25, 25 January 2012

Versions of the FDL after 1.2 require e.V. approval - a safeguard since we cannot foresee future licenses.

Our license statements do need some clarification, and someone is already working on this, but since there are legal implications it isn't a quick job.

16:43, 30 January 2012