GFDL 1.2 is listed twice

Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 27 January 2012 at 19:26.
The highlighted comment was edited in this revision. [diff]

There are two identical bullets in §8 describing GFDL 1.2, they differ only in KDE approval. Why is that? Is it a way of legally saying that unapproved licenses are allowed?

Should it be assumed that documentation that bears no licensing metadata is GFDL?

    Yecril71pl12:25, 25 January 2012