Contribute/Bugsquad/BugDays/06APR08/Bugs needing attention from Konqueror developers

< Contribute‎ | Bugsquad‎ | BugDays‎ | 06APR08
Revision as of 07:08, 6 May 2008 by Grundleborg (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Bugs needing attention from Konqueror developers

Add bugs here if you need to find out whether the observed behavior is intended, or if there's some other reason that it would be useful for a Konqueror developer to take a look. Make sure you indicate why the bug needs attention from them.

  • bug #79897 - Bug with complete testcases. Firefox 3b5 behavior is like konqueror (on KDE3 and KDE4). Actually konqueror is respecting standard. Emulate IE breaking them is not a good idea. FiNeX
  • bug #80285 - On this report is proposed to split on certain condition long lines without spaces. FiNeX
  • bug #52665 - Issue about XML mime. Need some attention. A lot of testcase are still valid. FiNeX
  • bug #92670 - DOCTYPE bug, looks related to bug #52665 and bug #71813 kirun
  • bug #53175 - Question about JS which test the browser. How should konqueror be identified? FiNeX
  • bug #47320 - no idea what to do about this one... probably best to do nothing Grundleborg
  • bug #40116 - can't figure out what's going on here. Grundleborg
  • bug #50815 - not sure if this is intended behavior or not? Grundleborg
  • bug #60956 - carewolf: what to do about this bug? Grundleborg
  • bug #59803 - Icky XSLTProcessor and browser specific stuff. Blauzahl
  • bug #65516 - don't know about this one. test case wraps in both konq and firefox. Don't know what the correct behavior is. Grundleborg
  • bug #65606 - should this bug be closed as per the last comment, or is the _new stuff really a bug? Grundleborg
  • bug #65673 - behavior is still the same as firefox. Should it be changed? Grundleborg
  • bug #83284 - testcase (needs label), confirmed, needs checking what the default behaviour should be.
  • bug #85712 - external testcase, too slow to check the bug. If this concerns META Refresh is there another way to test this? lemma
  • bug #88377 - Need some attention: is this a kmail or a konqueror bug? Is kmail using khtml for rendering html emails? FiNeX
  • bug #86671 - The websites which were reported to make konqueror crash are changed/closed. There is no testcase or specific instruction. Instead there are about 20 duplicate of the bug. (maybe some dups are not real dups says Grundleborg on IRC) FiNeX
  • bug #80771 - problem seems to be much less severe on KDE4, perhaps the bad JS code is responsible for the CPU use? Grundleborg
  • bug #88817 - Cannot reproduce because the first website is not reachable and gmail interface (see comment #8) is quite unusable with konqueror trunk. FiNeX
  • bug #89382 - Seems fixed on 3.5. Cannot reproduce on trunk because pressing "CTRL" access keys are not displayed. FiNeX
  • bug #89838 - Need some attention by developers. FiNeX
  • bug #90019 - Printing problem which is not applicabile in trunk. FiNeX
  • bug #87178 - External testcase is no longer reachable. The bug is about layers (Netscape 4.0). Basic tests with layers work and a larger testcase might be difficult to acquire. lemma
  • bug #106302 - From comments it seems that the problem could be of ghostscript and not a konqueror one. FiNeX
  • bug #93239 - default shortcut masks this, but behaviour is inconsistent between fields kirun
  • bug #105852 - Bug not reproducible on trunk because the find dialog will close after the search. Is this a wanted behavior? FiNeX
  • bug #90686 - Is this bug still valid for kde 4. FiNeX
  • bug #113905 - The bug cannot be tested because konqueror cannot render the form (regression???). FiNeX
  • bug #115120 - The bug is about the focus on links but konqueror 4 seems having some problem with them. FiNeX
  • bug #121458 - Need review from Germain - added link krop
  • bug #106669 - Need attention by developers. There is no testcase, bub maybe a useful backtrace? FiNeX
  • bug #98132 - Bug is about images being cached and displayed as broken even after having been added to the given location. Based on the comments I'm not sure whether this really is a bug... sim0nx
  • bug #98214 - "div style margin not rendered properly", when div-width is set to 100%, border isn't rendered.... this bug needs developer attention because the problem is still present, but firefox renders it exactly the same way sim0nx
  • bug #97245 - username/password from wallet only filled in after page completely loaded ... looks like a "feature request" not really like a bug. sim0nx
  • bug #108208 - Charset related problem. FiNeX
  • bug #117903 - Konqueror in trunk render the page better than 3.5.8. Is this better enough? (chinese webpage translated with google). FiNeX
  • bug #118013 - Question about caching. How should konqueror behave? FiNeX
  • bug #92703 - html form scrolling can someone fix this? Blauzahl
  • bug #70072 careful here, if you do find with right-click menu it is fine; closed with WORKSFORME otoh, if you do it with control-f it doesn't work, this is a regression, so i opened bug #160490 stupid web forms! Blauzahl I love it when devs fix my bugs!Blauzahl
  • bug #95177 - The original bug report is OK but there is some stuff further in comments that make Konqueror 4 crash. - JLP
  • bug #79369 - Custom konqueror stylesheet doesn't work. The bug cannot be reproduced! FiNeX
  • bug #115027 - Konqueror now render the page correctly. Maybe because the page is changed. FiNeX
    • however, there is a test-case and this still renders differently to other browsers. I don't know, though, which browser is correct, so this needs to be looked at by konq devs. Grundleborg
  • bug #81168 - don't know whether there is a bug here or what? SadEagle - over to you :). Grundleborg
  • bug #70525 - heh, bugzilla for bookmarks. apparently this is to go into regression testing, has it already? css Blauzahl
  • bug #120644 - css, testcase attached Blauzahl lemma
  • bug #71363 - who do we render as today? sounds like this is a policy thing Blauzahl
  • bug #66583 and bug #124050 have been marked duplicate. However I doubt they really are. Might be policy. lemma
  • bug #67148 Still present in 3.5.9 and trunk. Actually I think this might be about policy and (if so) could be considered INVALID. lemma
  • bug #76053 - can't reproduce in 4.0.3, possibly needs testing with different colour schemes though Njg234908
    • I can confirm this bug. On 3.5.9 it still behaves as described in the bug. On trunk it behaves just the opposite. lemma
    • This might actually be a policy thing. lemma
  • bug #90213 - Still needing a testcase. FiNeX
    • involves a dynamically created, ill-formed form.
    • created a simple testcase which works fine on 3.5.9 and trunk. needs checking if the testcase is valid. lemma
  • bug #82216 example site no longer accessible. requested a testcase or new sample site. Grundleborg
    • Site is reachable again. Seems to be heavy javascript use. Reproducible in 3.5.9 and trunk r799198 which yield different javascript errors. needs user-agent to be set to something other than konqueror (not supported by the script). lemma
  • bug #78285 - Described behaviour is still present in trunk and 3.5.9. Is this intended behaviour? Grundleborg
  • bug #105108 - There is a patch for KDE4, asked if it has been applied on trunk. FiNeX
    • This one contains a patch which seemingly has not been applied yet. lemma
  • bug #105140 - It is not clear what is the real problem. FiNeX
    • This is a policy thing regarding the drawing order of borders. We could probably close it but that depends on if there's a place this has been specified. lemma
  • bug #107430 - Javascript/doctype rendering problem. I've asked some more informations. FiNeX
    • This could probably be closed but needs developer confirmation to do so. lemma
  • bug #78285 - will this be fixed, or is it WONTFIX? Grundleborg

This page was last modified on 6 May 2008, at 07:08. This page has been accessed 779 times. Content is available under Creative Commons License SA 3.0 as well as the GNU Free Documentation License 1.2.
KDE® and the K Desktop Environment® logo are registered trademarks of KDE e.V.Legal