Projects/KDE on Solaris/FOSS specfiles: Difference between revisions
(<nowiki> != <code>) |
(Cleaning up) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
from Stefan Teleman's KDE4 on Solaris porting effort located on cvsdude.com. | from Stefan Teleman's KDE4 on Solaris porting effort located on cvsdude.com. | ||
(http://kdesolaris.svn.cvsdude.com). The tarballs are almost always a relative | (http://kdesolaris.svn.cvsdude.com). The tarballs are almost always a relative | ||
directory starting with Solaris/, and | directory starting with Solaris/, and contain patch, configure, build, and install scripts, as well as patches, and any custom files needed to build a module. | ||
However, they are difficult to deal with, and regenerating them is a bit of | However, they are difficult to deal with, and regenerating them is a bit of | ||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
somecfile.h.diff | somecfile.h.diff | ||
do | do | ||
# Strip off the trailing ".diff" | |||
NM=`echo $file | sed 's\.diff$,,'` | NM=`echo $file | sed 's\.diff$,,'` | ||
# | |||
# in case there's a trailing index value we want to remove... | # in case there's a trailing index value we want to remove... | ||
# so if the file was configure.01.diff, NM sees configure.01, | |||
# and what we really want is "configure". | |||
NM=`echo ${NM} | sed 's,\.[0-9]*$,,'` | NM=`echo ${NM} | sed 's,\.[0-9]*$,,'` | ||
# | |||
# just a counter so we can build the patchlist for the spec file, | |||
# and we match it to the patch, so it's really clear which patch | |||
# it should be | |||
# | |||
N=`echo ${N} | awk '{printf "%.02d",$1+1}'` | N=`echo ${N} | awk '{printf "%.02d",$1+1}'` | ||
# strip off preceding 0 for the %patch | # | ||
# strip off preceding 0 for the %patch and Patch${Y} commands | |||
Y=`echo ${N} | sed 's,^0,,'` | Y=`echo ${N} | sed 's,^0,,'` | ||
# | |||
# rename the file to something more "unique" | |||
# | |||
mv $file Mypkg-1.0.1-${NM}.${N}.diff | mv $file Mypkg-1.0.1-${NM}.${N}.diff | ||
# | |||
# Create the patchlist entry for this patch. | |||
# | |||
echo "Patch${Y}:\t\t%{patchprefix}-${NM}.${N}.diff" >> patchlist | echo "Patch${Y}:\t\t%{patchprefix}-${NM}.${N}.diff" >> patchlist | ||
# | |||
# Create the patching entry for this patch (%prep area) | |||
# | |||
echo "%patch${Y} -p1" >> patching | echo "%patch${Y} -p1" >> patching | ||
done</code> | done</code> | ||
Line 61: | Line 80: | ||
b) the section above %prep, is where you will insert "patchlist" | b) the section above %prep, is where you will insert "patchlist" | ||
Above patchlist, you | Above patchlist, you | ||
%define patchprefix %{src_name}-%{src_ver} | <code>%define patchprefix %{src_name}-%{src_ver} </code> | ||
so we don't have to care about changing the stupid patch file names | so we don't have to care about changing the stupid patch file names | ||
every time we uprev a package. It also makes it dead simple to copy | every time we uprev a package. | ||
existing patches from a previous revision for a new one and tune those | |||
patches for the next revision. To understand this value, I was able to | There are a couple of reasons we do this: | ||
use this method to uprev gstreamer-0.10.17 to gstreamer-0.10.22 iteratively | 1) patches must have unique names because they are copied to packages/SOURCES | ||
in less that 2 hours. I got stuck at 0.10.23 since that wanted glib2-2.14 | 2) when we up rev a package, we don't lose the ability to build a | ||
and FOSS at that time only had glib2-2.12.12 | previous revision of the package, without some "mecurial" magic. | ||
3) a patch has been submitted the pkgbuild repo to allow the | |||
patch mechanism to use relative paths to patches, which means | |||
that patches/<PKG NAME>/<SRC VER>/patchname.diff. Eventually, | |||
this means that spec/patches won't have to be a dumping ground | |||
for all patches. | |||
It also makes it dead simple to copy existing patches from a previous revision for a new one and tune those patches for the next revision. To understand this value, I was able to use this method to uprev gstreamer-0.10.17 to gstreamer-0.10.22 iteratively in less that 2 hours. I got stuck at 0.10.23 since that wanted glib2-2.14 and FOSS at that time only had glib2-2.12.12 | |||
c) in the %prep section, include "patching" file from above. | c) in the %prep section, include "patching" file from above. | ||
Line 83: | Line 109: | ||
All your new patches should go in spec/patches/%{src_name}/%{src_ver} | All your new patches should go in spec/patches/%{src_name}/%{src_ver} | ||
and then symlink those into spec/patches. | and then symlink those into spec/patches. | ||
Using a very simple %if clause, a spec file can now support multiple | Using a very simple %if clause, a spec file can now support multiple |
Revision as of 15:47, 3 December 2009
Currently, solaris.bionicmutton.org/SRC contains tarballs that originate from Stefan Teleman's KDE4 on Solaris porting effort located on cvsdude.com. (http://kdesolaris.svn.cvsdude.com). The tarballs are almost always a relative directory starting with Solaris/, and contain patch, configure, build, and install scripts, as well as patches, and any custom files needed to build a module.
However, they are difficult to deal with, and regenerating them is a bit of a PITA, and pretty much makes working on KDE4 an exclusive club with secret handshake and associated drama.
Starting in the kde4-specs-440 tree, there is an effort going on to convert all those modules from the DUDE tarball, to a purely spec format. Due to the fact that the FOSS modules are built for both 32-bit and 64-bit, there are two components minimum to each module.
1) FOSS<modulename>.spec - this contains all the high level information, with package name, version, description, license, package dependencies, and a package list. Any new modules or updated modules should include a explicit package list, so that changes between versions of packages can be tracked. Globals in the plist is just sloppy, but I understand why it happens.
2) base-specs/base-<module>.spec - this contains pretty much what was found in the DUDE Solaris tarball (typically Solaris-PGKNAME-REVISION,MINORREV.tar.gz). Decomposing a Solaris tarball should go something like this:
a) extract all the patches. prefix them with the packagename-version, postfixed with an index starting at 01, and ending in .diff
typically, an apply_patches script has something like:
#!/bin/sh
for file in \
configure.diff \
config.h.diff \
Makefile.diff \
somecfile.c.diff \
somecfile.h.diff
do
gpatch -p1 Solaris/diffs/$file
done
I convert it to read:
#!/bin/sh
N=0
for file in \
configure.diff \
config.h.diff \
Makefile.diff \
somecfile.c.diff \
somecfile.h.diff
do
- Strip off the trailing ".diff"
NM=`echo $file | sed 's\.diff$,,'`
- in case there's a trailing index value we want to remove...
- so if the file was configure.01.diff, NM sees configure.01,
- and what we really want is "configure".
NM=`echo ${NM} | sed 's,\.[0-9]*$,,'`
- just a counter so we can build the patchlist for the spec file,
- and we match it to the patch, so it's really clear which patch
- it should be
N=`echo ${N} | awk '{printf "%.02d",$1+1}'`
- strip off preceding 0 for the %patch and Patch${Y} commands
Y=`echo ${N} | sed 's,^0,,'`
- rename the file to something more "unique"
mv $file Mypkg-1.0.1-${NM}.${N}.diff
- Create the patchlist entry for this patch.
echo "Patch${Y}:\t\t%{patchprefix}-${NM}.${N}.diff" >> patchlist
- Create the patching entry for this patch (%prep area)
echo "%patch${Y} -p1" >> patching
done
what this does is move all the files into a more "orderly" list with a created patchlist that can be imported into the base-spec file, as well as the patching order.
b) the section above %prep, is where you will insert "patchlist"
Above patchlist, you
%define patchprefix %{src_name}-%{src_ver}
so we don't have to care about changing the stupid patch file names
every time we uprev a package.
There are a couple of reasons we do this: 1) patches must have unique names because they are copied to packages/SOURCES 2) when we up rev a package, we don't lose the ability to build a
previous revision of the package, without some "mecurial" magic.
3) a patch has been submitted the pkgbuild repo to allow the
patch mechanism to use relative paths to patches, which means that patches/<PKG NAME>/<SRC VER>/patchname.diff. Eventually, this means that spec/patches won't have to be a dumping ground for all patches.
It also makes it dead simple to copy existing patches from a previous revision for a new one and tune those patches for the next revision. To understand this value, I was able to use this method to uprev gstreamer-0.10.17 to gstreamer-0.10.22 iteratively in less that 2 hours. I got stuck at 0.10.23 since that wanted glib2-2.14 and FOSS at that time only had glib2-2.12.12
c) in the %prep section, include "patching" file from above. Additionally, include the configure.sh, converting most ${} variables to %{} variables, unless they are truly shell variables.
d) in the %build section, import build.sh. clean it up
e) in the %install section, import install.sh, clean it up. This section is usually trickiest because of the way 32 and 64 bit binaries get made, and how some packages have a hard time honoring the configured paths.
All your new patches should go in spec/patches/%{src_name}/%{src_ver} and then symlink those into spec/patches.
Using a very simple %if clause, a spec file can now support multiple revisions, with all the behavior customized off that specific version to include package requirements, explicit plists, patches, applying patches, configure changes, etc. It takes a little bit more effort than just chopping up a spec file because a bunch of stuff changed.