Projects/Contributor Paths: Difference between revisions

From KDE TechBase
(Update with some links)
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
* [http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.internationalization-and-documentation/15941 Translator]
* [http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.internationalization-and-documentation/15941 Translator]
* Bugsquad - [ link]
* Bugsquad - [ link]
* Usability Team - [ link]
* [http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-usability&m=123056383919172&w=2 Usability Team]
* [http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-promo&m=123056251917223&w=2 Promotion Team]
* [http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-promo&m=123056251917223&w=2 Promotion Team]
* [http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.www/355 Websites Team]
* [http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.www/355 Websites Team]

Revision as of 15:24, 29 December 2008

This is a temporary page to hold information about creating techbase pages for contributor paths. The idea is to reorganize the tutorials already present on techbase into categories to teach new people to contribute. The focus is on lowering the barrier to entry, and identifying gaps in the techbase tutorials.

The original thread is here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/55248

What I'm looking for is

  • Consensus - Is this a good idea and something we want?
  • Correctness - As I know nothing about artists work, I don't know if creating icons is harder than creating themes, and I don't know if the steps in the path are correct. Similar for the others (docs, translation, etc)
  • Collaboration - Will you help fill the gaps in the techbase documentation?

Followups here: