Projects/Plasma/AppsMenuReorganization: Difference between revisions
< Projects
Shaforostoff (talk | contribs) m (→Education) |
Shaforostoff (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''Apps Menu Structure Proposal''. I'd like to make apps menu more fine-grained by introducing submenus | '''Apps Menu Structure Proposal'''. I'd like to make apps menu more fine-grained by introducing submenus | ||
==Internet== | ==Internet== | ||
===Web=== | ===Web=== | ||
*Konqueror | *Konqueror | ||
*Firefox | |||
*Opera | |||
*Akregator | *Akregator | ||
===File download and sharing=== | ===File download and sharing=== | ||
Line 9: | Line 11: | ||
*KTorrent | *KTorrent | ||
*KGet | *KGet | ||
*KFtpGrabber | |||
===Communication=== | ===Communication=== | ||
*KMail | *KMail | ||
Line 23: | Line 26: | ||
===Play and Manage=== | ===Play and Manage=== | ||
*amarok | *amarok | ||
*<videoplayers> | |||
*k3b | *k3b | ||
*<tag editors> | *<tag editors> | ||
===Create and edit=== | ===Create and edit=== | ||
*Kino | *Kino | ||
Line 100: | Line 103: | ||
'''Explanation''' | |||
*if several apps fulfill the same function (i.e. konqueror, opera, firefox), then their title should be in form of %function% - %appname%: "Web-browser - Konqueror" | |||
*We need a special entries in .desktop files determining the priority (Menu-Priority, Menu-Priority-KDE, Menu-Priority-Gnome). | |||
**Because the order is important | |||
**apps with Menu-Priotity above 100 constant could be visually separated | |||
by the line (they are the main apps in the category) | |||
**apps with Menu-Priotity below 10 may be hidden at all (i.e. they are rarely used by an average user) | |||
**If category has only 1 item, the item should be displayed instead of | |||
category | |||
**Statistics is needed for this (simple voting?) | |||
*'Utilities' category isn't needed at all. For example, 'root terminal' should be in System. | |||
*Plasmoids: a lot of small apps need to be turned into plasmoids. | |||
**charselect should be callable from anywhere but K-Menu | |||
**kcalc -- the same | |||
**dictionary applet | |||
I like the way desktop widgets are displayed in Mac OS X (easy accessible any moment - e.g. clock, calendar, calc) | |||
Line 121: | Line 138: | ||
Critisism I recieved from kde-devel@ so far: | Critisism I recieved from kde-devel@ so far: | ||
*.... submenus are bad. They do not seem very usable to me, especially when the structure is not evident: ... | |||
**so it's better to look through all 10-20 entries (possibly in in each | |||
so it's better to look through all 10-20 entries (possibly in in each | category) before finding app that you need? | ||
category) | **there should be no more then ~5 items in each category | ||
before finding app that you need? | |||
*This breaks traditional alphabetical order... | |||
alphabetical order is of small value when user doesnt know the name of the | **alphabetical order is of small value when user doesnt know the name of the | ||
app he is looking for. | app he/she is looking for. | ||
And this is said to be false: "the menu is for newcomers, experienced users use 'Search' field anyway." | |||
anyway. |
Revision as of 12:42, 15 April 2008
Apps Menu Structure Proposal. I'd like to make apps menu more fine-grained by introducing submenus
Internet
Web
- Konqueror
- Firefox
- Opera
- Akregator
File download and sharing
- aMule
- KTorrent
- KGet
- KFtpGrabber
Communication
- KMail
- Kopete
- Konversation
- Kontact
- Knode
Connectivity
- KPPP
- KRDC
- KRFB
- <monitoring apps?>
Multimedia
Play and Manage
- amarok
- <videoplayers>
- k3b
- <tag editors>
Create and edit
- Kino
- Audacity
Graphics
View and Manage
- Okular
- Gwenview
- Digikam
Create and edit
- Krita
- Kolourpaint
- Gimp
Education
- Blinken
Lingustic
- KHangMan
- KWordQuiz
- Parley
Math
- KmPlot
- KAlgebra
- Kig
Science
- KStars
- Kalzium
- KTurtle
- Step
Office
- Okular
- Kwrite
Groupware
- kontact
- KOrganizer
- KTimeTracker (remove from menu -- present as plasmoid)
- Kalarm (remove from menu -- present as plasmoid?)
- KAddressBook
- <Syncing apps>
- <other kdepim apps>
OpenOffice.org
- <openoffice apps>
KOffice
- <koffice apps>
Desktop publishing
- scribus
- kile
- lyx
System Tools
- Konsole
- KSysGuard
- KSystemLog
- Strigi search
- KSnapShot
- <backup app>
- <Accessibility apps>
Configuration
- <...>
Engineering
- kompare
Programming
- KDevelop
- KCachegrind
- <Version control tools?>
Web-development
- Quanta
Translation
- Lokalize
CAD
Math
Explanation
- if several apps fulfill the same function (i.e. konqueror, opera, firefox), then their title should be in form of %function% - %appname%: "Web-browser - Konqueror"
- We need a special entries in .desktop files determining the priority (Menu-Priority, Menu-Priority-KDE, Menu-Priority-Gnome).
- Because the order is important
- apps with Menu-Priotity above 100 constant could be visually separated
by the line (they are the main apps in the category)
- apps with Menu-Priotity below 10 may be hidden at all (i.e. they are rarely used by an average user)
- If category has only 1 item, the item should be displayed instead of
category
- Statistics is needed for this (simple voting?)
- 'Utilities' category isn't needed at all. For example, 'root terminal' should be in System.
- Plasmoids: a lot of small apps need to be turned into plasmoids.
- charselect should be callable from anywhere but K-Menu
- kcalc -- the same
- dictionary applet
I like the way desktop widgets are displayed in Mac OS X (easy accessible any moment - e.g. clock, calendar, calc)
Alternatively, instead of 'Office' we could use 'Desktop Publishing',
putting
'Groupware (Kontact)' into 'Internet' +merge 'Graphics' to 'Multimedia':
- Multimedia
- k3b
- Music
- Play and Manage (amarok, tag editors)
- Create and edit (Audacity)
- Video
- Play
- Create and edit (kino, etc)
- Graphics
- View and Manage (Gwenview, Digikam)
- Create and edit (Krita, Kolourpaint, Gimp)
- Music
Critisism I recieved from kde-devel@ so far:
- .... submenus are bad. They do not seem very usable to me, especially when the structure is not evident: ...
- so it's better to look through all 10-20 entries (possibly in in each
category) before finding app that you need?
- there should be no more then ~5 items in each category
- This breaks traditional alphabetical order...
- alphabetical order is of small value when user doesnt know the name of the
app he/she is looking for.
And this is said to be false: "the menu is for newcomers, experienced users use 'Search' field anyway."