User:Danimo/Wiki Scenarios: Difference between revisions
Appearance
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
** Might grow very big | ** Might grow very big | ||
** Requires namespaces | ** Requires namespaces | ||
** No obvious structure | |||
** No homogenous target audience | |||
Unattractive for subprojects | |||
=== n /wiki per site === | === n /wiki per site === | ||
Line 37: | Line 41: | ||
* Investigate OpenID | * Investigate OpenID | ||
* Investigate which target audiences we/the projects want | |||
* Talk to subprojects | |||
** What solution do they prefer? | |||
** To what extend would they go with whatever we do? | |||
** Whats the additional value for them to join the effort? | |||
* How and where to migrate the contents of the current wikis? |
Revision as of 18:07, 2 July 2007
Possible Scenarios for future Wiki use on *.kde.org
wiki.kde.org with namespaces
- Pros
- Easy to maintain
- Cons
- Might grow very big
- Requires namespaces
- No obvious structure
- No homogenous target audience
Unattractive for subprojects
n /wiki per site
- Pros
- Very flexible for projects
- Cons
- Sharing templates impossible
- Sharing files quite hard
- Interwiki-Links are of limited use
- n databases
n role-based wiki sites
Possible compromise between the two suggestions above.
- Pros
- Less wiki instances than one per site
- Cons
- Sharing templates impossible
- Sharing files quite hard
- Interwiki-Links are of limited use
- n databases
Action items
- Investigate OpenID
- Investigate which target audiences we/the projects want
- Talk to subprojects
- What solution do they prefer?
- To what extend would they go with whatever we do?
- Whats the additional value for them to join the effort?
- How and where to migrate the contents of the current wikis?