Category talk:Python: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (→nice =)) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
just a quicky to say that i like the idea of these language specific categories. whee! and i think [[User:milliams|milliams]] gets devnew contributor of the week this week, no? =) --[[User:Aseigo|Aseigo]] 09:29, 5 January 2007 (CET) | just a quicky to say that i like the idea of these language specific categories. whee! and i think [[User:milliams|milliams]] gets devnew contributor of the week this week, no? =) --[[User:Aseigo|Aseigo]] 09:29, 5 January 2007 (CET) | ||
:Thankyou :D. What do you think about having a "Language Independent/Agnostic/Neutral" category? And what do you think it should be called? --[[User:Milliams|milliams]] 16:48, 5 January 2007 (CET) | |||
:Ok, I created a [[:Category:Programming|Programming category]] which contains all the different language categories. We can either simply put all language agnostic pages in the "Programming" category or we can still create a "Language Independent/Agnostic/Neutral" category (which would be a subcategory of Programming like C++, Java etc.) for those pages. | |||
::Programming Agnostic pages should probably just be under the "Programming" category so that it doesn't just become a placeholder for language names. --[[User:Krakrjak|Krakrjak]] 17:52, 5 January 2007 (CET) | |||
:::Sounds fair. I'll see about categorising some pages --[[User:Milliams|milliams]] 18:26, 5 January 2007 (CET) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:26, 5 January 2007
nice =)
just a quicky to say that i like the idea of these language specific categories. whee! and i think milliams gets devnew contributor of the week this week, no? =) --Aseigo 09:29, 5 January 2007 (CET)
- Thankyou :D. What do you think about having a "Language Independent/Agnostic/Neutral" category? And what do you think it should be called? --milliams 16:48, 5 January 2007 (CET)
- Ok, I created a Programming category which contains all the different language categories. We can either simply put all language agnostic pages in the "Programming" category or we can still create a "Language Independent/Agnostic/Neutral" category (which would be a subcategory of Programming like C++, Java etc.) for those pages.
- Programming Agnostic pages should probably just be under the "Programming" category so that it doesn't just become a placeholder for language names. --Krakrjak 17:52, 5 January 2007 (CET)
- Sounds fair. I'll see about categorising some pages --milliams 18:26, 5 January 2007 (CET)