Talk:Development/Architecture: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
m (typos) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Who gave the SIMPLINUX presentation? "I" on a wiki doesn't work well, being collaborative and all.... so I edited what was copied from developer.kde.org - [[User:CuCullin|CuCullin]] 22:27, 21 December 2006 (CET) | Who gave the SIMPLINUX presentation? "I" on a wiki doesn't work well, being collaborative and all.... so I edited what was copied from developer.kde.org - [[User:CuCullin|CuCullin]] 22:27, 21 December 2006 (CET) | ||
:I believe it was Richard Moore. Imo we should avoid using "I", even the term "Author" on the top of some articles is irritating, as it to some degree implies "This is my article, don't touch it". How do others feel about this? Maybe a simple "Maintainer" or "Initial Author" would be better? [[User:Dhaumann|Dhaumann]] 14:32, 22 December 2006 (CET) |
Latest revision as of 13:33, 22 December 2006
Who gave the SIMPLINUX presentation? "I" on a wiki doesn't work well, being collaborative and all.... so I edited what was copied from developer.kde.org - CuCullin 22:27, 21 December 2006 (CET)
- I believe it was Richard Moore. Imo we should avoid using "I", even the term "Author" on the top of some articles is irritating, as it to some degree implies "This is my article, don't touch it". How do others feel about this? Maybe a simple "Maintainer" or "Initial Author" would be better? Dhaumann 14:32, 22 December 2006 (CET)