Projects/kde.org/Meetings/June09: Difference between revisions

From KDE TechBase
(allow for "What links here" navigation on the other page)
No edit summary
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This meeting focuses on KDE wikis.
{{Proposed_deletion|reason=it has been moved to community.kde.org}}


= date =
This face-to-face meeting focuses on KDE Wikis. It's supported by [http://ev.kde.org KDE e.V.]
See http://www.doodle.com/z2ukyr3nxx8k6bc2 for a vote.


= past wiki meetings =
= Date =
* [[PIM/Meetings/Osnabrueck_7#Web_Site_Meeting]]
Sunday, June 28th, to Monday 29th 2009
 
= Location =
 
Nokia Qt Software Office, Berlin Adlershof
 
= Goals =
 
* Migrate obsolete web content to userbase and techbase (e.g. pim.kde.org and kontact.kde.org)
* Find a place and a structure for community content (see techbase/Projects and the ideas around communitybase.kde.org)
* Improve Wiki style, so it handles our needs, e.g. in terms of program code, better.
* Implement common login for techbase and userbase
* Implement template for applications on userbase
* Find solution for wiki.kde.org (this is a [http://community.kde.org/KDE_PIM/Meetings/Osnabrueck_7#redirects follow up])?
* Write down a clear definition of what content should go where, and what purpose the different Wikis have
* ...
 
= Past wiki meetings =
* [http://community.kde.org/KDE_PIM/Meetings/Osnabrueck_7#Web_Site_Meeting Meeting during KDE PIM Meeting 2009]


= ToDo =
= ToDo =
* how do we handle different languages (this is a [http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/PIM/Meetings/Osnabrueck_7#translations follow-up])?
* how do we handle different languages (this is a [http://community.kde.org/KDE_PIM/Meetings/Osnabrueck_7#translations follow-up])?
: At the moment, all is a mess. If I do a search in a pure english installation, I may get russian results, [[User:Tstaerk|I]] do not like this. This could be easily solved with namespaces.
: At the moment, all is a mess. If I do a search in a pure english installation, I may get russian results, [[User:Tstaerk|I]] do not like this. This could be easily solved with namespaces.
** possible solution: mediawiki namespaces
** possible solution: mediawiki namespaces
::: tstaerk's favorite solution, yet to be tested
::: tstaerk's favorite solution, yet to be tested. Problem: How do we adapt the [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgNamespacesToBeSearchedDefault name spaces to be searched by default]? Maybe [http://www.tutorialized.com/view/tutorial/Redirect-Visitors-by-Browser-Language/10157 so]?
** possible solution: subdomains
** possible solution: subdomains
::: Frederic Sheedy <[email protected]> has an interest in developing this area.  we have already discussed it in broad terms. annew
::: Frederic Sheedy <[email protected]> has an interest in developing this area.  we have already discussed it in broad terms. annew
* what about wiki.kde.org (this is a [http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/PIM/Meetings/Osnabrueck_7#redirects follow up])?
* rating system wanted?
* rating system wanted?
* what about breadcrumb navigation?
* what about breadcrumb navigation?
::: jstaniek is going to do this for userbase. annew
::: jstaniek is going to do this for userbase. annew
* how do we make openid work in the sense of one login for both userbase and techbase sites?
* how do we make openid work in the sense of one login for both userbase and techbase sites?
* what about the community web site described at [http://community.kde.org/KDE_PIM/Meetings/Osnabrueck_7 Osnabrueck_7]?
** we want '''two pages''': one for users and one for developers. The developers' page will focus on community and technology. If we make a separate page for the community, we will run into definition problems: E.g. what about projects? Do they belong to community or to technology?
*** tstaerk
** we want '''three pages''': userbase, techbase and community
** we want '''four pages''': userbase, techbase, community and projects
* can't we show "this site has been visited X times" below an article?
* can't we show "this site has been visited X times" below an article?
* can we all get a Unix user for immanuel? Is it all running on immanuel?

Latest revision as of 17:16, 8 March 2016

 
Proposed for Deletion
This page has been proposed for deletion for the following reason:

it has been moved to community.kde.org

This face-to-face meeting focuses on KDE Wikis. It's supported by KDE e.V.

Date

Sunday, June 28th, to Monday 29th 2009

Location

Nokia Qt Software Office, Berlin Adlershof

Goals

  • Migrate obsolete web content to userbase and techbase (e.g. pim.kde.org and kontact.kde.org)
  • Find a place and a structure for community content (see techbase/Projects and the ideas around communitybase.kde.org)
  • Improve Wiki style, so it handles our needs, e.g. in terms of program code, better.
  • Implement common login for techbase and userbase
  • Implement template for applications on userbase
  • Find solution for wiki.kde.org (this is a follow up)?
  • Write down a clear definition of what content should go where, and what purpose the different Wikis have
  • ...

Past wiki meetings

ToDo

  • how do we handle different languages (this is a follow-up)?
At the moment, all is a mess. If I do a search in a pure english installation, I may get russian results, I do not like this. This could be easily solved with namespaces.
    • possible solution: mediawiki namespaces
tstaerk's favorite solution, yet to be tested. Problem: How do we adapt the name spaces to be searched by default? Maybe so?
    • possible solution: subdomains
Frederic Sheedy <[email protected]> has an interest in developing this area. we have already discussed it in broad terms. annew
  • rating system wanted?
  • what about breadcrumb navigation?
jstaniek is going to do this for userbase. annew
  • how do we make openid work in the sense of one login for both userbase and techbase sites?
  • what about the community web site described at Osnabrueck_7?
    • we want two pages: one for users and one for developers. The developers' page will focus on community and technology. If we make a separate page for the community, we will run into definition problems: E.g. what about projects? Do they belong to community or to technology?
      • tstaerk
    • we want three pages: userbase, techbase and community
    • we want four pages: userbase, techbase, community and projects
  • can't we show "this site has been visited X times" below an article?
  • can we all get a Unix user for immanuel? Is it all running on immanuel?