Special:Badtitle/NS90:Talk:Policies/Licensing Policy/GFDL 1.2 is listed twice: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 19:26, 27 January 2012

There are two identical bullets in §8 describing GFDL 1.2, they differ only in KDE approval. Why is that? Is it a way of legally saying that unapproved licenses are allowed?

Should it be assumed that documentation that bears no licensing metadata is GFDL?

Revision as of 12:25, 25 January 2012 view source Yecril71pl (talk \| contribs) 77 edits New thread: GFDL 1.2 is listed twice		Latest revision as of 19:26, 27 January 2012 view source Yecril71pl (talk \| contribs) 77 edits they differ only in KDE approval
Line 1:		Line 1:
	There are two identical bullets in §8 describing GFDL 1.2, they differ only in ~~letter spacing~~. Why is that?		There are two identical bullets in §8 describing [[GFDL]] 1.2, they differ only in [[KDE]] approval. Why is that? Is it a way of legally saying that unapproved licenses are allowed?

	Should it be assumed that documentation that bears no licensing metadata is GFDL?		Should it be assumed that documentation that bears no licensing metadata is [[GFDL]]?