(→Getting_Started/Build/KDE4_(bn_IN)) |
(→Sorting in feature list: new section) |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
==Getting_Started/Build/KDE4_(bn_IN) == | ==Getting_Started/Build/KDE4_(bn_IN) == | ||
Thank you for explaining me. I misunderstood the previous message of yours. Thanks again for pointing me to the right direction :) | Thank you for explaining me. I misunderstood the previous message of yours. Thanks again for pointing me to the right direction :) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Sorting in feature list == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why did you manually move (to sort) the stuff in the feature list? | ||
| + | It totally breaks the history... :( | ||
| + | |||
| + | IMHO it should had been some kind of automatic sorting... or this sadly proves once again the old system was quite better.. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[user:Pino|pino]] 11:32, 17 March 2008 (CET) | ||
Its fine to delete the kdesvn-build page. I will merge my content into the existing page. Also, I will also modify the link from the Getting Started page to point to the existing kdesvn-build page. Kunalthakar 19:51, 7 November 2007 (CET)
Contents |
Thanks for the information.. If I got more questions, can I ask you then?
Hi, Thanks for movinh Qualig?ty team to a another place.. I did ngot know where to place it.. I'm going to move more from quality.kde.org, should I move it to the same folder or what?
Hi guy !!! I would like to know if menu bar translation is possible... If true, how could I do this? Thank you...
Hi, Dhaumann, can you read and write Chinese? Cool! --Liangqi 23:00, 18 June 2007 (CEST)
Hi, Dhaumann, thanks for links fixes. I had fixed the link you were talking about. Thanks a lot. --Powerfox 19:15, 31 July 2007 (CEST)
Thank you a lot for fixing the links of galician tech base ;).
Thank you for explaining me. I misunderstood the previous message of yours. Thanks again for pointing me to the right direction :)
Why did you manually move (to sort) the stuff in the feature list? It totally breaks the history... :(
IMHO it should had been some kind of automatic sorting... or this sadly proves once again the old system was quite better..
--pino 11:32, 17 March 2008 (CET)