<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://techbase.kde.org/skins/common/feed.css?0.2"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title=Thread:User_talk:Vishesh/Nepomuk_pages/reply_(2)&amp;feed=atom&amp;action=history</id>
		<title>Thread:User talk:Vishesh/Nepomuk pages/reply (2) - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title=Thread:User_talk:Vishesh/Nepomuk_pages/reply_(2)&amp;feed=atom&amp;action=history"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title=Thread:User_talk:Vishesh/Nepomuk_pages/reply_(2)&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2013-05-22T07:27:34Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.20.2</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title=Thread:User_talk:Vishesh/Nepomuk_pages/reply_(2)&amp;diff=77198&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>AnneW: Reply to Nepomuk pages</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title=Thread:User_talk:Vishesh/Nepomuk_pages/reply_(2)&amp;diff=77198&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2012-12-11T11:46:46Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Reply to &lt;a href=&quot;/Thread:User_talk:Vishesh/Nepomuk_pages/reply&quot; title=&quot;Thread:User talk:Vishesh/Nepomuk pages/reply&quot;&gt;Nepomuk pages&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;That's to be expected, but since translators can easily see only the changed messages, it's not a problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've started work on this, but I ask your help with [[Projects/Nepomuk/Resources#Managing_Properties]].  The recent theme change brought about an anomaly that is to be corrected this week, all being well, and will impact on this section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When we designed the markup originally we came to the conclusion that we would use colouration to differentiate user input and processor output.  &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;syntaxhighlight&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; is the tool of choice where coding markup needs to be preserved, &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;{{Input|1=...}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; is for commands or blocks of commands where that is not a necessity, and &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; is for short snippets of code, to be read inline.  Since they are all input, they should share the same colouration.  We kept &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; for monospaced text without the input colouration, where we didn't want to imply that it is something for the user to type in.  I hope this all makes sense to you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The upshot is that when the &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; css entry is amended this week, I think the colouration will give an impression that is not your intention.  I suggest that &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; might suit better.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm going to continue preparing for translation, but I'll not take the final steps until I've heard from you.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AnneW</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>