http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:Policies/Licensing_Policy/GFDL_1.2_is_listed_twice&feed=atom&action=history 2013-05-21T13:56:34Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.20.2 http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:Policies/Licensing_Policy/GFDL_1.2_is_listed_twice&diff=68467&oldid=prev 2012-01-27T19:26:33Z

<p>they differ only in KDE approval</p> <table class='diff diff-contentalign-left'> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black;">Revision as of 19:26, 27 January 2012</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="background: #ffa; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>There are two identical bullets in §8 describing GFDL 1.2, they differ only in <del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">letter spacing</del>.&#160; Why is that?</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>There are two identical bullets in §8 describing <ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">[[</ins>GFDL<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">]] </ins>1.2, they differ only in <ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">[[KDE]] approval</ins>.&#160; Why is that<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">?&#160; Is it a way of legally saying that unapproved licenses are allowed</ins>?</div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="background: #ffa; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>Should it be assumed that documentation that bears no licensing metadata is GFDL?</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>Should it be assumed that documentation that bears no licensing metadata is <ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">[[</ins>GFDL<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">]]</ins>?</div></td></tr> </table>

Yecril71pl http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:Policies/Licensing_Policy/GFDL_1.2_is_listed_twice&diff=68414&oldid=prev 2012-01-25T12:25:30Z

<p>New thread: GFDL 1.2 is listed twice</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>There are two identical bullets in §8 describing GFDL 1.2, they differ only in letter spacing. Why is that?<br /> <br /> Should it be assumed that documentation that bears no licensing metadata is GFDL?</div>

Yecril71pl