Difference between revisions of "Thread:Talk:Policies/Licensing Policy/GFDL 1.2 is listed twice"

Jump to: navigation, search
(New thread: GFDL 1.2 is listed twice)
 
(they differ only in KDE approval)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
There are two identical bullets in §8 describing GFDL 1.2, they differ only in letter spacing.  Why is that?
+
There are two identical bullets in §8 describing [[GFDL]] 1.2, they differ only in [[KDE]] approval.  Why is that?  Is it a way of legally saying that unapproved licenses are allowed?
  
Should it be assumed that documentation that bears no licensing metadata is GFDL?
+
Should it be assumed that documentation that bears no licensing metadata is [[GFDL]]?

Latest revision as of 20:26, 27 January 2012

There are two identical bullets in §8 describing GFDL 1.2, they differ only in KDE approval. Why is that? Is it a way of legally saying that unapproved licenses are allowed?

Should it be assumed that documentation that bears no licensing metadata is GFDL?


This page was last modified on 27 January 2012, at 20:26. This page has been accessed 122 times. Content is available under Creative Commons License SA 3.0 as well as the GNU Free Documentation License 1.2.
KDE® and the K Desktop Environment® logo are registered trademarks of KDE e.V.Legal