Difference between revisions of "Thread:Talk:Policies/Licensing Policy/GFDL 1.2 is listed twice"

Latest revision as of 20:26, 27 January 2012

There are two identical bullets in §8 describing GFDL 1.2, they differ only in KDE approval. Why is that? Is it a way of legally saying that unapproved licenses are allowed?

Should it be assumed that documentation that bears no licensing metadata is GFDL?

Revision as of 13:25, 25 January 2012 (view source) Yecril71pl (Talk \| contribs) (New thread: GFDL 1.2 is listed twice)		Latest revision as of 20:26, 27 January 2012 (view source) Yecril71pl (Talk \| contribs) (they differ only in KDE approval)
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	There are two identical bullets in §8 describing GFDL 1.2, they differ only in ~~letter spacing~~. Why is that?	+	There are two identical bullets in §8 describing [[GFDL]] 1.2, they differ only in [[KDE]] approval. Why is that? Is it a way of legally saying that unapproved licenses are allowed?

−	Should it be assumed that documentation that bears no licensing metadata is GFDL?	+	Should it be assumed that documentation that bears no licensing metadata is [[GFDL]]?