Talk:Policies/Licensing Policy

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
license comparison online website000:12, 3 December 2012
GFDL 1.2 is listed twice117:43, 30 January 2012
First page
First page
Next page
Next page
Last page
Last page

license comparison online website

I'm linking this here, though i'd prefer to see it on the main page, because i think it gives a good breakdown of what can and can't be done with licenses, etc.

http://www.tldrlegal.com/

and i also don't want to lose this website link ;)

Sreich (talk)00:12, 3 December 2012

GFDL 1.2 is listed twice

There are two identical bullets in §8 describing GFDL 1.2, they differ only in KDE approval. Why is that? Is it a way of legally saying that unapproved licenses are allowed?

Should it be assumed that documentation that bears no licensing metadata is GFDL?

Yecril71pl13:25, 25 January 2012

Versions of the FDL after 1.2 require e.V. approval - a safeguard since we cannot foresee future licenses.

Our license statements do need some clarification, and someone is already working on this, but since there are legal implications it isn't a quick job.

Annew17:43, 30 January 2012
 
First page
First page
Next page
Next page
Last page
Last page

This page was last modified on 19 June 2009, at 21:50. This page has been accessed 6,040 times. Content is available under Creative Commons License SA 3.0 as well as the GNU Free Documentation License 1.2.
KDE® and the K Desktop Environment® logo are registered trademarks of KDE e.V.Legal