Talk:Policies/Kdelibs Coding Style - Revision history

Pkpatel88 at 06:01, 7 February 2009

2009-02-07T06:01:11Z

Aseigo at 22:01, 16 February 2007

2007-02-16T22:01:09Z

Dhaumann: +e

2007-02-15T22:36:17Z

Dhaumann at 22:34, 15 February 2007

2007-02-15T22:34:15Z

Dhaumann: my pov

2007-02-15T22:30:11Z

my pov

Mkretz at 20:19, 15 February 2007

2007-02-15T20:19:49Z

New page

The document says: "Use curly braces when the body of a conditional statement contains more than one line, and also if a single line statement is somewhat complex."

I thought we decided that we always want curly braces, no?
--[[User:Mkretz|Mkretz]] 21:19, 15 February 2007 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:01, 7 February 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:

	::: indeed i did, as that was what was discussed and agreed upon in trysil. given that a majority of the active kdelibs developers were there, including probably our most central ones, i think that's good enough =) --[[User:Aseigo\|Aseigo]] 23:01, 16 February 2007 (CET)		::: indeed i did, as that was what was discussed and agreed upon in trysil. given that a majority of the active kdelibs developers were there, including probably our most central ones, i think that's good enough =) --[[User:Aseigo\|Aseigo]] 23:01, 16 February 2007 (CET)
		+
		+
		+	Where it says "Kdelibs coding style follows the Qt 4 coding style." There should be maybe a link that points out Qt 4 coding style. --[[User:Pkpatel88\|Pkpatel88]] 23:59, 06 February (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:01, 16 February 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:

	::meanwhile aaron already changed it, wheee ;) --[[User:Dhaumann\|Dhaumann]]		::meanwhile aaron already changed it, wheee ;) --[[User:Dhaumann\|Dhaumann]]
		+
		+	::: indeed i did, as that was what was discussed and agreed upon in trysil. given that a majority of the active kdelibs developers were there, including probably our most central ones, i think that's good enough =) --[[User:Aseigo\|Aseigo]] 23:01, 16 February 2007 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:36, 15 February 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:my pov: According to Zack's attachement this is not the case. As it makes sense to stick to the Qt style for the libs I'd say the current rule is fine. The attachemet also had the final rule '''Feel free to break a rule if it makes your code look bad'''. We should include it as well :) I did not and will not read the whole thread again ;) --[[User:Dhaumann\|Dhaumann]] 23:30, 15 February 2007 (CET)		:my pov: According to Zack's attachement this is not the case. As it makes sense to stick to the Qt style for the libs I'd say the current rule is fine. The attachemet also had the final rule '''Feel free to break a rule if it makes your code look bad'''. We should include it as well :) I did not and will not read the whole thread again ;) --[[User:Dhaumann\|Dhaumann]] 23:30, 15 February 2007 (CET)

−	::meanwhile aaron ~~alrady~~ changed it, wheee ;) --[[User:Dhaumann\|Dhaumann]]	+	::meanwhile aaron already changed it, wheee ;) --[[User:Dhaumann\|Dhaumann]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:34, 15 February 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:

	:my pov: According to Zack's attachement this is not the case. As it makes sense to stick to the Qt style for the libs I'd say the current rule is fine. The attachemet also had the final rule '''Feel free to break a rule if it makes your code look bad'''. We should include it as well :) I did not and will not read the whole thread again ;) --[[User:Dhaumann\|Dhaumann]] 23:30, 15 February 2007 (CET)		:my pov: According to Zack's attachement this is not the case. As it makes sense to stick to the Qt style for the libs I'd say the current rule is fine. The attachemet also had the final rule '''Feel free to break a rule if it makes your code look bad'''. We should include it as well :) I did not and will not read the whole thread again ;) --[[User:Dhaumann\|Dhaumann]] 23:30, 15 February 2007 (CET)
		+
		+	::meanwhile aaron alrady changed it, wheee ;) --[[User:Dhaumann\|Dhaumann]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:30, 15 February 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I thought we decided that we always want curly braces, no?		I thought we decided that we always want curly braces, no?
	--[[User:Mkretz\|Mkretz]] 21:19, 15 February 2007 (CET)		--[[User:Mkretz\|Mkretz]] 21:19, 15 February 2007 (CET)
		+
		+	:my pov: According to Zack's attachement this is not the case. As it makes sense to stick to the Qt style for the libs I'd say the current rule is fine. The attachemet also had the final rule '''Feel free to break a rule if it makes your code look bad'''. We should include it as well :) I did not and will not read the whole thread again ;) --[[User:Dhaumann\|Dhaumann]] 23:30, 15 February 2007 (CET)