Talk:Development/Tools: Difference between revisions

From KDE TechBase
No edit summary
 
(more thoughts)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
I think we should have a dedicated page for QA. Maybe under [[Development/Tools/Quality Assurance]] or directly under Development. --[[User:Dhaumann|Dhaumann]] 13:23, 13 February 2007 (CET)
I think we should have a dedicated page for QA. Maybe under [[Development/Quality Assurance]] . --[[User:Dhaumann|Dhaumann]] 13:23, 13 February 2007 (CET)
 
:In fact, all the stuff under Quality Assurance (Dashbot, EBN) could go to [[Getting_Started]], at least that's where the KDE4 build instructions are. The Dashbot and EBN are tightly related to this after all. --[[User:Dhaumann|Dhaumann]] 23:07, 7 March 2007 (CET)
 
----
 
Reading edits like:
* <nowiki><tt>{{file|`kde-config --localprefix`/share/config/kdeglobals}}</tt></nowiki>
 
I think the <nowiki><tt></nowiki> should go into the template itself.
--[[User:Dhaumann|Dhaumann]] 23:07, 7 March 2007 (CET)

Latest revision as of 22:07, 7 March 2007

I think we should have a dedicated page for QA. Maybe under Development/Quality Assurance . --Dhaumann 13:23, 13 February 2007 (CET)

In fact, all the stuff under Quality Assurance (Dashbot, EBN) could go to Getting_Started, at least that's where the KDE4 build instructions are. The Dashbot and EBN are tightly related to this after all. --Dhaumann 23:07, 7 March 2007 (CET)

Reading edits like:

  • <tt>{{file|`kde-config --localprefix`/share/config/kdeglobals}}</tt>

I think the <tt> should go into the template itself. --Dhaumann 23:07, 7 March 2007 (CET)