Difference between revisions of "Projects/Marble/GraphicsViewGeoParser"

Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 59: Line 59:
  
 
=== Rethink the GeoData classes ===
 
=== Rethink the GeoData classes ===
It's unclear, if it is reasonable to save ALL GeoData* classes as a value, with "implicit sharing" making it fast. Multi-level data stored as a value is a bit complicated. This will be discussed [[Projects/Marble/GeoData/PointerVsImplicitShare here]]
+
It's unclear, if it is reasonable to save ALL GeoData* classes as a value, with "implicit sharing" making it fast. Multi-level data stored as a value is a bit complicated. This will be discussed in [[Projects/Marble/GeoData/PointerVsImplicitShare]]

Latest revision as of 13:56, 31 March 2010

Contents

[edit] The Problem

Data is read from files with the GeoDataParser framework in order to be displayed.

The GeoData framework is used to manipulate GeoDataObject classes. GeoData should be accessed in a sensible way because of its "shared data" logic.

Items to be displayed are GeoGraphicsItems, following the GeoGraphicsView framework.

The Link between GeoData and GeoGraphicsItems has to permit:

  • To display corresponding items, and get the data updates.
  • To edit data through interaction (i.e. clicking on the map, dragging an item, changing the text of a placemark, adding placemarks)

[edit] A bit of history and issues

[edit] GeoData manipulation

Previously, GeoData has been accessed through shallow copy from the rendering objects. this posed problems as GeoData uses data sharing internally and updates in GeoData were thus not seen in Items.

[edit] Model-View framework

Also, the Model-View framework from Qt has been used many times with various shades of success for that specific matter (see Model View status for more info).

A "Model" in the Model-view framework in Qt is an interface to facilitate access to lists of data from widgets which need not know what data is inside. The interface may sound nice, but the abstraction is a bit too much when the interaction between data and its representation increases. These "Model" are also not data stores in order to avoid the previous issue.

[edit] Possible Solutions and discussion

[edit] Multiple Inheritance try

Multiple inheritance could be possible where GeoGraphicsItems would also be GeoNodes:

  • but that raises issues regarding modularity, because both the model and its representation would be in the same object
    • Somebody could want to display the GeoData as a list for example.
  • we try not to have multiple inheritance at all (please add reasons)

[edit] Time of creation of GeoGraphicsItems

To display the GeoDataFeature- and GeoDataGeometry-objects we want to use GeoGraphicsItems on a global GeoGraphicsScene. This leads to the problem when to create the GeoGraphicsItems for displaying on the scene:

  • Creating the items as they were read.
    • This will probably be really slow as GeoGraphicsItems shouldn't be created in the thread which parses the file (why not?)
    • This will use (lots of) memory as everything has to be ready for painting.
  • Using a proxy concept: In another Thread runs a check for the GeoDataFeatures and GeoDataGeometries which entered the scene (because of moving around). This will probably go through a list of say 20000 entries, but, as it runs in a thread it won't stop the user interface from repainting. As the user interface repaints (in main thread), the GeoGraphicsItems for the new GeoData...-objects are created (we know which are needed because of our Proxy-Thread). Our GeoGraphicsScene allows to add items temporary, removing them when they are out of the viewport for some time. Our GeoGraphicsScene would hold about 200 entries, which can be access via a list or a BSP-tree (depending on which turns out to be more reasonable).
    • Using a BSP-tree here, it should be possible to keep many entries in GeoGraphicsScene.

[edit] Display the data

We should follow an Observer Pattern logic for the first goal whereas GeoGraphicsItems would observe the GeoData.

Multiple options are available for an observer pattern implementation:

  • use signal/slots

After all, this is one of Qt's best success.

For reference, Qt4.6 snapshot doc regarding animation proposes for GraphicsItems to inherit QObject to receive signals from animation framework.

A less obtrusive solution is possible with some intermediary QObject-derived class which would manipulate GeoGraphicsItems when GeoData updates.


  • implement light event handling methods (like java event listener classes)
  • use qt's model-view framework of itemviews-ng

More info needed to see if it fits the observer solution...

A first glance at [ItemView-ng Project API] shows not much radical change in the model interaction compared to previous itemview...

[edit] Edit the data

We should think carefully about storing data to provide the second goal, so that editing is done in the GeoData and then updates happen in GeoGraphicsItems as a result.

[edit] Rethink the GeoData classes

It's unclear, if it is reasonable to save ALL GeoData* classes as a value, with "implicit sharing" making it fast. Multi-level data stored as a value is a bit complicated. This will be discussed in Projects/Marble/GeoData/PointerVsImplicitShare


This page was last modified on 31 March 2010, at 13:56. This page has been accessed 2,985 times. Content is available under Creative Commons License SA 3.0 as well as the GNU Free Documentation License 1.2.
KDE® and the K Desktop Environment® logo are registered trademarks of KDE e.V.Legal