DarioAndres (Talk | contribs) (→Getting Started: Find what to work on (Different Approaches)) |
DarioAndres (Talk | contribs) (→Check bug reports of a product over a period of time) |
||
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
* Template search for all the reports of any status, since 2008: any kind of report, crashes, normal bugs, feature requests | * Template search for all the reports of any status, since 2008: any kind of report, crashes, normal bugs, feature requests | ||
* Template search for all the open reports, since 2008: any kind of report, crashes, normal bugs, feature requests | * Template search for all the open reports, since 2008: any kind of report, crashes, normal bugs, feature requests | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
=Workflow of the bug triaging activity= | =Workflow of the bug triaging activity= | ||
Initial version by Dario Andres (2010-03). Corrections by Lydia Pintscher
All this guide is based on my own experience (approximately 2 years) on the KDE bug tracker.
It may not work for you ;)
If you are not familiar with the Bugzilla (KDE bug tracker system) interface, you may find this guide useful: Quick Introduction to Bugzilla
Manpower is always needed in a bug tracker, but as any action taken on it may be potentially destructive to other people's work; or it may end up messing things up (and consuming the developers' or other triager's time) the tracker requires special permissions to perform changes in bug reports.
If you want to work in the bug tracker you need to prove that you know what you are doing.
Initially you will ask for support on #kde-bugs (on IRC) and add comments in the bug report (so other people will see and check them, perform the needed actions, and evaluate your work)
You could use different techniques or approaches to triage the reports according to your current mood or the amount of work you want to do for example.
Note: The two following techniques are complementary.
In this technique you check all the bug reports (of all the products) which were filed today (or some days ago).
You can focus on crash, normal or wish reports individually (recommended) or all of them together.
Good:
Not so Good:
This technique could be used every week (or every day)
Choose a product (application or library). Then choose a period of time like 1 month or 1 or 2 years (or "from the beginning of the current year"). You can also choose which kind of reports you want to handle.
This technique is useful to audit old bugs or perform a deep clean (in case that the bugs weren't triaged on a daily basis previously).
Good:
Not so Good:
You can also filter out results (and be even more focused) if you select a custom component inside the product (a subsection of the application).
This technique could be used two times a month.