Difference between revisions of "Contribute/Bugsquad/BugDays/KonquerorDay3/Bugs to be marked as INVALID"

Revision as of 16:07, 6 May 2008

Bugs to be marked as INVALID

Bugs which are no longer valid go here. A link to the bug and why it qualifies as invalid should be provided.

Some examples of when a bug should be closed as INVALID:

• The reported behavior is not a bug
• The bug is completely unrelated to KDE

This list is not exhaustive. If you feel a bug is invalid for any other reason, be sure to list it here, mentioning why you think it is invalid.

• bug #160998 - He uses exactly the same version of Konqueror (3.5.9, from Kubuntu) as me, and I haven't had any trouble with it using default settings. Talavis
  • He closed it on his own accord Talavis
• bug #31054 - still present in 3.5.9, but seems unlikely to be fixed there (from comments). Treeview does not seem to exist in trunk, so I guess will not be fixed. Grundleborg
• bug #140723 - Kubuntu KDE upgrade problem. Blauzahl told me to close the bug report.
• bug #148329 - The HTML code of the page does not correspond to the snippet posted on the report and is rendered correctly on both 3.5.9 and 4.0.3. rakuco
• bug #140808 - i cannot reproduce the problem. Apparently the reporter only forget to save the profile. I contacted him and he told me to close the bug report.
• bug #101661 - I don't feel that the wished for behavior is a desire of the general populace azuriel
• bug #126477 - Not a bug, changed to WISH. FiNeX