Difference between revisions of "Contribute/Bugsquad/BugDays/AmarokDay1/Bugs to be marked as INVALID"

Jump to: navigation, search
(Bugs to be marked as INVALID)
(Bugs to be marked as INVALID)
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
*{{Bug|139173}} unspecific, incomprehensible (something about the konqueror plugin). Reporter didn't reply when he was prompted for a better explanation. [[User:Lemma|Lemma]]
 
*{{Bug|139173}} unspecific, incomprehensible (something about the konqueror plugin). Reporter didn't reply when he was prompted for a better explanation. [[User:Lemma|Lemma]]
 +
 +
*{{Bug|143893}} - I really doubt this is anything amarok is doing wrong! [[User:Grundleborg|Grundleborg]]

Revision as of 14:31, 15 June 2008

Bugs to be marked as INVALID

Bugs which are no longer valid go here. A link to the bug and why it qualifies as invalid should be provided.

Some examples of when a bug should be closed as INVALID:

  • The reported behavior is not a bug
  • The bug is completely unrelated to Amarok
  • The reported behavior is due to a misconfiguration

This list is not exhaustive. If you feel a bug is invalid for any other reason, be sure to list it here, mentioning why you think it is invalid.

  • bug #130389 seems to be caused by missing MySQL privileges (WONTFIX from Nightrose) Aides 10:54, 15 June 2008 (CEST)
    • invalid would be better than wontfix, yea --Nightrose 11:05, 15 June 2008 (CEST)
  • bug #130869 ancient report with unknown specifics, gets WONTFIX from Nightrose -- Aides
  • bug #144889 outdated, no move since 2007-04-30 21:18. --Mamarok 14:12, 15 June 2008 (CEST)
  • bug #122412 outdated, no move since 2006-03-06 11:45. --Mamarok 14:19, 15 June 2008 (CEST)
  • bug #139173 unspecific, incomprehensible (something about the konqueror plugin). Reporter didn't reply when he was prompted for a better explanation. Lemma

KDE® and the K Desktop Environment® logo are registered trademarks of KDE e.V.Legal