Category talk:KDE4 - Revision history

Milliams: /* Do we need the kde4 category */

2007-01-05T13:14:04Z

‎Do we need the kde4 category

Milliams: /* Do we need the kde4 category */ Consistency

2007-01-05T13:13:18Z

‎Do we need the kde4 category: Consistency

Aseigo at 08:27, 5 January 2007

2007-01-05T08:27:58Z

New page

== Do we need the kde4 category ==
do we really need to mark kde4 tutorials as such? the implication is that they are all kde4 tutorials unless otherwise marked, no?

the only real benefit i can see is that 5-7 years down the road when we start making kde5 we won't have to tag the kde4 articles ;)

thoughts? --[[User:Aseigo|Aseigo]] 09:27, 5 January 2007 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:14, 5 January 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	thoughts? --[[User:Aseigo\|Aseigo]] 09:27, 5 January 2007 (CET)		thoughts? --[[User:Aseigo\|Aseigo]] 09:27, 5 January 2007 (CET)

−	:I think it helps to avoid ambiguity. If readers see pages that are marked as KDE3 and then see others with no markers at all, I don't think they should assume KDE4. I feel it's a matter of consistency.	+	:I think it helps to avoid ambiguity. If readers see pages that are marked as KDE3 and then see others with no markers at all, I don't think they should assume KDE4. I feel it's a matter of consistency. --[[User:Milliams\|milliams]] 14:14, 5 January 2007 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:13, 5 January 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:

	thoughts? --[[User:Aseigo\|Aseigo]] 09:27, 5 January 2007 (CET)		thoughts? --[[User:Aseigo\|Aseigo]] 09:27, 5 January 2007 (CET)
		+
		+	:I think it helps to avoid ambiguity. If readers see pages that are marked as KDE3 and then see others with no markers at all, I don't think they should assume KDE4. I feel it's a matter of consistency.