Difference between revisions of "Category talk:KDE4"

Latest revision as of 14:14, 5 January 2007

[edit] Do we need the kde4 category

do we really need to mark kde4 tutorials as such? the implication is that they are all kde4 tutorials unless otherwise marked, no?

the only real benefit i can see is that 5-7 years down the road when we start making kde5 we won't have to tag the kde4 articles ;)

thoughts? --Aseigo 09:27, 5 January 2007 (CET)

I think it helps to avoid ambiguity. If readers see pages that are marked as KDE3 and then see others with no markers at all, I don't think they should assume KDE4. I feel it's a matter of consistency. --milliams 14:14, 5 January 2007 (CET)

Revision as of 09:27, 5 January 2007 (view source) Aseigo (Talk \| contribs)		Latest revision as of 14:14, 5 January 2007 (view source) Milliams (Talk \| contribs) m (→‎Do we need the kde4 category)
(One intermediate revision by one user not shown)
Line 5:		Line 5:

	thoughts? --[[User:Aseigo\|Aseigo]] 09:27, 5 January 2007 (CET)		thoughts? --[[User:Aseigo\|Aseigo]] 09:27, 5 January 2007 (CET)
		+
		+	:I think it helps to avoid ambiguity. If readers see pages that are marked as KDE3 and then see others with no markers at all, I don't think they should assume KDE4. I feel it's a matter of consistency. --[[User:Milliams\|milliams]] 14:14, 5 January 2007 (CET)