Talk:Policies/Licensing Policy

• [History↑]

Search terms: 

Sorting order: last modified first newest threads first oldest threads first

Contents

Thread title	Replies	Last modified
license comparison online website	0	00:12, 3 December 2012
GFDL 1.2 is listed twice	1	17:43, 30 January 2012

license comparison online website

• History
• Summarise

I'm linking this here, though i'd prefer to see it on the main page, because i think it gives a good breakdown of what can and can't be done with licenses, etc.

http://www.tldrlegal.com/

and i also don't want to lose this website link ;)

• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

Sreich (talk)‎00:12, 3 December 2012

GFDL 1.2 is listed twice

• History
• Summarise

There are two identical bullets in §8 describing GFDL 1.2, they differ only in KDE approval. Why is that? Is it a way of legally saying that unapproved licenses are allowed?

Should it be assumed that documentation that bears no licensing metadata is GFDL?

• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

Yecril71pl‎13:25, 25 January 2012

Versions of the FDL after 1.2 require e.V. approval - a safeguard since we cannot foresee future licenses.

Our license statements do need some clarification, and someone is already working on this, but since there are legal implications it isn't a quick job.

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

Annew‎17:43, 30 January 2012